Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
dc.contributor.author | Lordelo, Patricia | - |
dc.contributor.author | Maron, Fabio | - |
dc.contributor.author | Barros, Daniela G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Barroso, Danilo V. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bessa Junior, José de | - |
dc.contributor.author | Barroso Júnior, Ubirajara de Oliveira | - |
dc.creator | Lordelo, Patricia | - |
dc.creator | Maron, Fabio | - |
dc.creator | Barros, Daniela G. | - |
dc.creator | Barroso, Danilo V. | - |
dc.creator | Bessa Junior, José de | - |
dc.creator | Barroso Júnior, Ubirajara de Oliveira | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-10T15:06:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-10-10T15:06:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1677-5538 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/16377 | - |
dc.description | Texto completo: acesso restrito. p. 383-388 | pt_BR |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the basic knowledge of pre–school teachers who deal with children between the ages of 4 and 7 years, who present signs of lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a survey with 50 teachers from 9 private schools working with pre–school children. The criteria for selection were if teachers were certified or non–certified elementary school teachers – NCEST and the amount of professional experience.
RESULTS: Thirty–three teachers considered that the normal daily urinary frequency should be from 4 to 7 times. Two of the 50 teachers considered it normal to urinate less than 4 times per day and 15 teachers considered more than 7 times per day as normal. There was no difference between the 2 categories of certified or NCEST nor between those with more or less than five years of professional experience. Thirty–three percent believed that to urinate more than 4 times during a class period (4–5 hours) could indicate a urinary problem. There was a statistically significant difference among the certified and NCEST but not in terms of time of professional experience. If during this period the child would not ask to urinate, only 18% considered that as an indication of urinary problem. When asked about the symptoms that would indicate urinary urgency and urge incontinence, only 24% of the teachers connected it with urinary problem. There was no difference in terms of professional background or professional experience in these 2 last analyses.
CONCLUSION: Our data shows evidences that private pre–schools teachers are not well informed of the clinical manifestation of LUTD. | pt_BR |
dc.language.iso | en | pt_BR |
dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | pt_BR |
dc.source | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382007000300012 | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Children | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Urinary incontinence | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Etiology | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Enuresis | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Schools | pt_BR |
dc.title | Lower urinary tract dysfunction in children. What do pre–school teachers know about it? | pt_BR |
dc.title.alternative | International Brazilian Journal of Urology | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo de Periódico | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.number | v. 33, n. 3 | pt_BR |
dc.publisher.country | Brasil | pt_BR |
Aparece nas coleções: | Artigo Publicado em Periódico (Faculdade de Medicina)
|