Skip navigation
Universidade Federal da Bahia |
Repositório Institucional da UFBA
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/5506
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Fred Luciano Neves-
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Marilda de Souza-
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Neci Matos-
dc.creatorSantos, Fred Luciano Neves-
dc.creatorGonçalves, Marilda de Souza-
dc.creatorSoares, Neci Matos-
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-05T17:54:04Z-
dc.date.available2012-03-05T17:54:04Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.issn1678-4391-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/5506-
dc.descriptionp.119-125.pt_BR
dc.description.abstractAmoebiasis is an infection caused by Entamoeba histolytica and is a potential health risk in countries in which health barriers are inappropriate. Since the discovery of Entamoeba dispar, the prevalence of amoebiasis has been modified. Objective: This study has standardized the PCR technique applied for the diagnosis of different species of the E. histolytica/E. dispar complex and has evaluated the prevalence of infection among patients attending private and public clinical laboratories in Salvador City, Bahia State, Brazil. Results: Analysis of 52,704 stool samples by microscopic examination demonstrated that 1,788 (3.4%) were positive for the E. histolytica/E. dispar complex and infection occurred more often in samples originated from public clinical laboratories (5.0%) than those that came from private laboratories (3.2%). PCR performed in approximately 15% (262) E. histolytica/ E. dispar complex positive samples, randomly chosen, amplified 227 samples (86.6%), all of them positive for E. dispar. The non-amplified 35 samples (13.4%) were also negative for E. histolytica-specific galactose adhesin. Moreover, to exclude a probable infection caused by E. hartmanni, morphometric analysis demonstrated that non-amplified samples had cyst sizes comparable to E. histolytica/E. dispar (>10 μm). Conclusion: The absence of amplification of these samples indicates the presence of PCR inhibitors in the stool samples or the presence of DNA from Entamoeba species other than E. dispar, E. histolytica or E. hartmanni.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.subjectamebiasispt_BR
dc.subjectEntamoeba histolyticapt_BR
dc.subjectdiagnosispt_BR
dc.subjectprevalencept_BR
dc.titleValidation and utilization of PCR for differential diagnosis and prevalence determination of Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar in Salvador City, Brazilpt_BR
dc.title.alternativeBrazilian Journal of Infectious Diseasespt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.number15(2)pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo Publicado em Periódico (FAR)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
v15n2a05.pdf922,5 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.